|
|
Review Process
Applications that are complete and responsive to this announcement
will be evaluated for merit by the Research Council. The Research
Council will then provide a prioritized list of recommendations for
funding to the Vice President for Research and Health Sciences based on
the quality of the proposals per the review criteria (see below). The
Vice President for Research and Health Sciences will make awards based
on Research Council’s recommendations and available funds.
Research Merit:
- Does the proposal provide a compelling argument for the
research?
- Does the proposed project represent a significant contribution
to the investigator's field of study? If so, how?
- Is there a probability of publication or public dissemination?
If so, who is the audience for the proposed work, and why will they
value it?
Nature of Proposal:
- Does the proposal provide a clear statement of overall project
objectives?
- Are the proposed methodologies appropriate and accurate?
- Does the proposal provide a sound justification with clear and
specific budget information?
- What is the likelihood of definitive results and conclusions?
- Is the text of the proposal well-written?
- Is the timeline and budget proposed feasible?
Leverage:
- Will the project lead to further scholarly activity?
- Does it improve chances for funding from existing sources?
- Does the project offer opportunities for funding from new
sources?
- Does the project help build research networks?
Reporting:
- If the investigator(s) has received previous funding from the
Research Office, have all required reports been appropriately
completed?
|
|
|
